Congress bans federal buildings named after sitting officials—with a loophole for the wealthy
H.R. 9902 — Federal Naming Standards Act · Filed by Bill Foster (D-IL) · 22 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 23, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits naming federal buildings, facilities, or programs after sitting elected officials or political appointees for 10 years after they leave office. The ban extends indefinitely for anyone earning over $1 million annually from commercial use of their name or image. The bill does not apply to deceased individuals or to names given before the law takes effect, and allows incidental historical or educational uses of names.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to prevent federal buildings and programs from being named after sitting or recently departed elected officials and appointees, reducing opportunities for self-aggrandizement and conflicts of interest in the use of public assets.
What the text implies
- The $1M commercial-use threshold creates a wealth-based carve-out: wealthy former officials who monetize their name/image can be honored indefinitely, while less commercially successful officials face the 10-year ban. This inverts the bill's anti-vanity intent for the richest former officials.
- The bill does not address naming of federal programs, grants, or initiatives after sitting officials in real time (e.g., a research program named after a current senator). The restriction applies only to formal naming/renaming of buildings and facilities, leaving other forms of official self-commemoration untouched.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill restricts government's ability to honor sitting or recently departed officials with federal real estate and programs, reducing the risk of self-dealing and vanity naming at public expense. Citizens gain transparency and accountability by preventing officials from leveraging public assets for personal brand-building, though the commercial-use extension creates a potential loophole for wealthy former officials.