States gain power to cap Medicaid benefits; beneficiaries bear the risk
H.R. 936 — Medicaid Improvement and State Flexibility Act of 2025 · Filed by Mark Green (R-TN) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 4, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows states to create Medicaid pilot programs where beneficiaries receive a fixed annual amount on a debit card for primary care and medications, plus a cash rebate for unused funds, and are enrolled in catastrophic insurance for major expenses. The federal government's total Medicaid spending for the state must not exceed what it would have spent without the program, and no funds can be used for abortion except to save the mother's life or in cases of rape or incest.
Why we flagged it
The bill reframes Medicaid from an open-ended entitlement into a fixed-dollar account system, shifting financial risk from the state/federal government to individual beneficiaries. The mechanism is presented as 'flexibility' but functionally caps and potentially reduces coverage.
- Abortion coverage prohibition unrelated to Medicaid restructuring mechanism; appears inserted as policy rider into technical waiver amendment.
What the text implies
- Beneficiaries who exhaust their card balance mid-year must rely on catastrophic insurance (high deductibles) for routine care, creating a two-tier system where low-income enrollees ration primary care.
- States have unilateral authority to set card amounts and catastrophic coverage terms with no federal minimum-benefit standards, enabling race-to-the-bottom benefit erosion across states.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
health insurance companies (catastrophic plan administrators); managed care organizations (potential contractors for card/payment administration); states (reduced Medicaid expenditure obligations)