Military academies barred from teaching diversity and race topics
H.R. 3765 — FALCONS Act · Filed by Mark Green (R-TN) · Introduced Jun 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the five federal military service academies from using any federal funds to teach, train, or develop curricula based on critical race theory, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). It does not defund the academies themselves, only restricts how they may spend money on these specific educational topics.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward prohibition on federal spending for a specific category of instruction at named public institutions. It is not a deregulation, subsidy, or hidden rider—it is a direct restriction on how public funds may be used.
What the text implies
- The bill does not define 'critical race theory' or 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' in statutory language, leaving academies and courts to interpret what curricula fall within the prohibition—potentially creating legal uncertainty and chilling effects on related instruction.
- Academies may respond by relabeling or restructuring existing programs to avoid the prohibited terms while preserving similar content, or by eliminating instruction entirely—the actual educational outcome is unclear.
- The restriction applies only to federal funds, not to private donations or state funds, creating a potential loophole if academies seek alternative funding sources.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill restricts educational content at public institutions, which raises transparency and academic-freedom concerns for citizens who fund and attend these academies. However, the bill does not eliminate the academies themselves or reduce their overall funding—it only narrows one category of permitted instruction. The civic cost (loss of curricular choice) and civic benefit (if one views DEI instruction as wasteful or ideologically problematic) are both real, making this a genuine trade-off ra
Named in the bill
United States Military Academy, United States Naval Academy, United States Air Force Academy, United States Coast Guard Academy, United States Merchant Marine Academy, Federal service academies
Where it stands
- Jun 5, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 5, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and House Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (699 characters) on Aug 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Military academies barred from teaching diversity and race topics” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3765 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.