Free wage access, but states lose power to regulate it as credit
H.R. 9330 — Earned Wage Access Consumer Protection Act · Filed by Bryan Steil (R-WI) · Introduced Jun 18, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires companies offering early wage access (letting workers borrow against future paychecks) to provide a free option alongside any paid option, disclose all fees and limits upfront, prohibit aggressive collection tactics, and ban default tip amounts above zero. It also exempts earned wage access from being treated as credit or loans under federal law, preempting stricter state regulations.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is consumer protection—mandatory free access, fee disclosure, and collection limits—but its structural effect is to preempt state laws and exempt EWA providers from credit regulation, creating a federal safe harbor that benefits the industry.
What the text implies
- Preemption of state laws (section 2(b)(2)) prevents states from treating EWA as credit or imposing lending standards, interest caps, or licensing requirements—potentially locking in a lighter regulatory regime than states might otherwise impose.
- Definition of 'earned wages' (section 2(e)(3)) relies on employer or provider representation; no independent verification requirement, creating risk of disputes over what wages have 'accrued' or are 'available'.
- Attestation requirement (section 2(a)(3)) places burden on workers to verify they haven't borrowed from multiple providers in the same pay period; no central registry or enforcement mechanism to prevent double-dipping by providers.
- Exemption from credit regulation (section 2(d)) means EWA providers avoid Truth in Lending Act disclosures, Dodd-Frank oversight, and state usury laws—a structural advantage over traditional payday lenders offering similar liquidity.
- Employer data disclosure (section 2(a)(9)) permits providers to share transaction dates and amounts with employers, potentially enabling workplace surveillance or discrimination based on financial distress signals.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Workers gain concrete protections: mandatory free access, fee transparency, no aggressive debt collection, and no credit-report damage. However, the bill's preemption of state laws treating EWA as credit may prevent states from imposing stricter lending standards, interest caps, or licensing requirements that could protect vulnerable workers from predatory terms.
Who stands to gain
- earned wage access providers (EWA platforms and fintech companies)
- payroll service vendors (expanded market for EWA integration)
- employers (reduced wage-advance requests, worker financial data)
Named in the bill
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, Earned Wage Access Providers, Employers, Payroll Service Vendors, Financial Institutions, Consumer Reporting Agencies, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Truth in Lending Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Fair Labor Standards Act
Where it stands
- Jun 18, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 18, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
- Jun 30, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jun 30, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 22”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
12 lobbying clients named this bill on 12 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $3,520,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 1 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 93% of bills with at least one filing.
Bryan Steil, the sponsor, reported $1,735,700 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Association for Justice — $1,840,000 on 1 filing
- Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc. — $480,000 on 1 filing
- American Federation of Teachers — $410,000 on 1 filing
- Chime Financial, Inc. — $350,000 on 1 filing
- Center for Responsible Lending a Supporting Corp of Ctr for Community Self-help — $90,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (18,105 characters) on Jul 5, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Free wage access, but states lose power to regulate it as credit” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9330 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.