Courts must retry agency facts in penalty cases—weakening enforcement
H.R. 9278 — To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act requires de novo trial of the facts when agency action seeks a sanction. · Filed by Harriet Hageman (R-WY) · Introduced Jun 11, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Administrative Procedure Act to require federal courts to conduct a full, independent review of factual findings whenever an agency imposes a sanction (penalty, fine, or disciplinary action) on a person or entity. Currently, courts typically defer to agency fact-finding unless it is clearly erroneous; this bill strips that deference and mandates de novo (fresh) judicial fact-finding in sanction cases.
Why we flagged it
The bill does not repeal any substantive rule or prohibition; instead, it raises the procedural bar for judicial deference to agency fact-finding in sanction cases. This shifts enforcement leverage away from agencies toward regulated entities and their lawyers, making it harder and costlier for agencies to impose penalties without full judicial re-litigation of facts.
What the text implies
- De novo fact review in sanction cases will dramatically increase litigation costs and timelines, likely favoring well-capitalized defendants over individuals or small businesses that cannot afford extended court battles.
- Agencies will face pressure to settle or reduce sanctions rather than litigate facts de novo, weakening enforcement of environmental, labor, consumer protection, and financial regulations.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
regulated industries facing EPA, OSHA, SEC, FTC, and other agency enforcement; large corporations with litigation budgets to relitigate facts; defense law firms specializing in administrative law