QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to strip California's right to set cleaner air standards

H.J.Res. 202 — Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Notice of Decision Granting a Waiver of Clean Air Act Preemption for California's 2009 and Subsequent Model Year Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards for New Motor Vehicles". · Filed by Harriet Hageman (R-WY) · Introduced Jul 18, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
12/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Environmental Deregulation

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to nullify an EPA decision that granted California a waiver allowing it to set its own stricter greenhouse gas emission standards for cars and trucks starting with 2009 model years. If passed, California and the roughly 17 states that follow its standards would lose the legal authority to enforce those tougher rules. The primary beneficiaries are automakers who prefer a single, less stringent national standard over California's stricter requirements.

Why we flagged it

The resolution's sole function is to strip California of its longstanding Clean Air Act waiver authority, effectively weakening vehicle emissions standards across roughly a third of the U.S. market.

What the text implies

  • Because approximately 17 other states have adopted California's vehicle emission standards under Section 177 of the Clean Air Act, nullifying this waiver could simultaneously invalidate those states' standards, affecting well over 100 million residents beyond California.
  • A successful CRA disapproval would bar the EPA from issuing a 'substantially similar' rule in the future without new congressional authorization, potentially locking in weaker standards long-term.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

traditional internal combustion engine automakers; oil and gas companies; auto parts suppliers focused on ICE vehicles

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record