Robot import ban hinges on secret national security test
H.R. 9129 — GUARD Act of 2026 · Filed by John Moolenaar (R-MI) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 3, 2026 · Markup held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Federal Communications Commission to evaluate whether humanoid and quadruped robots (and their control software) made by companies tied to countries of concern pose national security risks, and if so, to add them to the FCC's list of banned communications equipment. National security agencies have one year to make this determination; if they don't, all such robots are automatically banned. The bill applies only to robots made by foreign entities headquartered in or controlled by governments of countries of concern (like China, Russia, Iran), not NATO allies.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to establish a national security review process for foreign-made humanoid and quadruped robots before they can be sold or used in the U.S., with automatic bans as a backstop. It is a regulatory screening mechanism, not a subsidy, carve-out, or commemorative measure.
What the text implies
- The bill defines 'unacceptable risk' nowhere, leaving the standard entirely to agency discretion and classified determinations that Congress and the public cannot review. This creates a de facto veto power over robotics imports with minimal oversight.
- The automatic ban if agencies fail to decide within one year may incentivize agencies to ban preemptively rather than conduct thorough review, since inaction triggers a blanket prohibition.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. robotics manufacturers (domestic competitors to foreign-made humanoid/quadruped robots); Defense contractors with robotics divisions