FCC merger review gets a time bomb—auto-approval if regulators miss deadline
H.R. 7742 — Keep It Moving Act · Filed by August Pfluger (R-TX) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Feb 26, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill imposes strict time limits on the FCC's review of applications for telecom companies to transfer control or assign licenses. The FCC must determine completeness within 15 days, issue public notice within 7 days of completeness, and approve applications within 180 days (or 1 year if foreign-ownership review is required). If the FCC misses these deadlines, applicants can obtain a court order forcing approval unless the FCC proves in court that denial serves the public interest. The bill effectively converts regulatory review into a race against the clock, with automatic approval as the default outcome.
Why we flagged it
The bill's functional effect is to accelerate and de-risk FCC approval of telecom mergers and license transfers by imposing hard deadlines and automatic approval. While framed as procedural efficiency, it systematically weakens the FCC's ability to condition or deny applications on public-interest grounds.
What the text implies
- Automatic approval on deadline expiration means the FCC cannot deny applications based on public interest unless it wins a court case—a reversal of the normal burden of proof in administrative law.
- The 180-day timeline (or 1 year with foreign-ownership review) is substantially shorter than historical FCC review periods, compressing time for public comment and analysis of competitive harm.
- Foreign-ownership review (CFIUS-style) is still required but capped at 90 additional days, potentially limiting national-security scrutiny of foreign telecom investment.
- Pro forma transactions (minor transfers) are exempt from advance approval but only require 30-day post-transaction notice, reducing transparency for smaller deals that may aggregate into significant control shifts.
- The bill allows applicants to challenge FCC completeness determinations in court, creating a new litigation vector that could further delay or undermine regulatory review.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens lose regulatory oversight of telecom mergers and license transfers. By making approval automatic upon deadline expiration and requiring the FCC to prove public-interest harm in court (rather than applicants proving public benefit), the bill shifts power from public regulators to private companies. Telecom consolidation, foreign ownership, and spectrum control—all matters affecting consumer choice, pricing, and national security—become harder for the FCC to scrutinize meaningful
Who stands to gain
- major telecom carriers (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Charter, Comcast)
- spectrum-lease holders and wireless companies
- foreign telecom investors seeking US market entry
- private equity firms acquiring telecom assets
Named in the bill
FCC (Federal Communications Commission), Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the US Telecommunications Services Sector, US District Court for the District of Columbia, Title IV of the Communications Act of 1934, Section 309 of the Communications Act, Section 402 of the Communications Act, 28 USC Section 1651 (writs of mandamus)
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Feb 26, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 26, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
5 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $2,860,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 11 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 78% of bills with at least one filing.
August Pfluger, the sponsor, reported $1,070,325 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $10,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- National Association of Broadcasters — $2,620,000 on 1 filing
- Council for Citizens Against Government Waste — $140,000 on 1 filing
- Comcast Corporation — $50,000 on 1 filing
- National Taxpayers Union — $30,000 on 1 filing
- Center for Individual Freedom — $20,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 9, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“FCC merger review gets a time bomb—auto-approval if regulators miss deadline” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7742 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.