Congress moves to refund tariffs imposed under emergency powers
H.R. 7615 — RELIEF Act · Filed by Steven Horsford (D-NV) · 42 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 20, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires U.S. Customs and Border Protection to automatically refund all tariffs collected since January 1, 2025, under emergency economic powers, without requiring importers to file claims. The refunds must be processed within 90 days and apply to all goods imported during that period.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is a direct, automatic refund of tariffs collected under emergency economic powers. It is a reversal of tariff collection, not a new tariff regime or trade policy — it is a refund mechanism.
What the text implies
- Refund obligation may create significant federal budget impact if tariff revenue was already allocated or spent; no appropriation or offset mechanism is specified.
- Automatic refund without importer application may result in refunds to entities no longer in business or at incorrect addresses, creating unclaimed-funds issues.
- Bill does not address tariffs imposed under other statutory authorities (e.g., Section 301, Section 232) — scope is limited to IEEPA tariffs only, potentially creating unequal treatment.
- Removal of tariffs may increase import volumes and lower domestic prices, benefiting consumers but potentially harming domestic producers in protected sectors.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Importers and consumers benefit from tariff refunds and lower effective import costs. However, the bill does not address whether tariff revenue was already spent, whether refunds will strain federal finances, or whether tariff removal may affect domestic producers or workers in tariff-protected industries. The civic benefit (tariff relief) is concrete; the fiscal and distributional costs are real but unquantified.
Who stands to gain
- importers and distributors
- retail and e-commerce companies
- manufacturers reliant on imported inputs
- consumers (via lower effective import costs)
Named in the bill
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Commissioner of CBP, International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Tariff Act of 1930, importers of record
Where it stands
42 cosponsors: 42 Democrats.
- Feb 20, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 20, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,193 characters) on Apr 16, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to refund tariffs imposed under emergency powers” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7615 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.