Congress kills 50-year campaign-finance system, ties election grants to voter ID
H.R. 7418 — STEADFAST Act · Filed by Stephanie Bice (R-OK) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 9, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill terminates the federal public financing system for presidential campaigns (which has allowed candidates to opt into taxpayer-funded elections since 1976) and redirects all remaining funds plus future tax-return checkoff designations to a new grant program that pays States to upgrade voting equipment, implement cybersecurity, and purchase paper ballots. States must certify they prevent noncitizen voting and prioritize those requiring photo ID and paper ballots to receive larger grants.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward reallocation of federal tax revenue from presidential campaign financing to State election-security grants, but it is not neutral—it ties funding to State adoption of specific voting-access policies (photo ID, noncitizen verification), making it both an infrastructure investment and a policy lever.
What the text implies
- States that do not adopt photo ID or noncitizen-verification measures receive lower priority for grants, creating financial pressure to adopt voting policies that may reduce voter registration or turnout, particularly among marginalized populations.
- The bill terminates a 50-year-old public financing system without debate on whether candidates should continue to have a taxpayer-funded alternative to private fundraising, effectively ending that choice.
- Vendor certification by the Election Assistance Commission may exclude vendors with prior election-administration relationships, potentially limiting competition and raising costs for States.
- The $1 tax-return checkoff mechanism (allowing taxpayers to designate funds) has historically generated minimal revenue; the bill's reliance on this plus general appropriations creates uncertainty about actual funding levels for States.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a genuine public benefit—direct federal funding for election security infrastructure that most States lack resources to upgrade independently—but conditions that funding on States adopting specific voting policies (photo ID, noncitizen verification) that some voters and civil-rights advocates view as barriers to ballot access, creating a real trade-off between security investment and voting accessibility.
Who stands to gain
- voting-equipment manufacturers
- cybersecurity vendors serving election systems
- paper-ballot and ballot-printing suppliers
Named in the bill
Election Assistance Commission, Internal Revenue Code (Chapters 95, 96, 97), States and territories, Department of Homeland Security, Social Security Administration, Presidential Election Campaign Fund, Election Security Fund
Where it stands
4 cosponsors: 4 Republicans.
- Feb 9, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Feb 9, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on House Administration · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a…”
- May 14, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- May 14, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 8 - 3”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $2,660,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 13 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Stephanie Bice, the sponsor, reported $1,071,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Growth Energy Inc — $1,530,000 on 2 filings
- Poet, LLC — $770,000 on 1 filing
- Marquis Management LLC — $360,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,590 characters) on Jul 9, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress kills 50-year campaign-finance system, ties election grants to voter ID” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr7418 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.