QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress strips passports from Americans $2,500 behind on child support

H.R. 6903 — Ensuring Children Receive Support Act · Filed by Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Dec 18, 2025 · Passed chamber

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Child Support Enforcement via Passport…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends federal law to require the State Department to revoke passports of people who owe more than $2,500 in child support arrears, based on certification by the Health and Human Services Secretary. It removes language allowing the Secretary discretion to merely restrict or limit passports, making revocation mandatory. The bill includes an exception for emergency returns to the U.S., which may be granted a temporary passport.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a debt-collection tool: it weaponizes passport revocation as a mandatory enforcement lever for child support arrears above $2,500. While framed as child-welfare legislation, the actual function is administrative debt collection with collateral consequences for the debtor's liberty and livelihood.

What the text implies

  • Passport revocation may trap individuals abroad or prevent them from returning to the U.S. to earn income to pay arrears, creating a debt-collection paradox.
  • No visible due-process requirement: the bill does not mandate notice, hearing, or opportunity to contest the debt before revocation, relying on HHS certification alone.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill strips citizens of a fundamental right—international travel and passport access—based on a debt threshold, with no due-process safeguards, hardship exceptions, or proportionality review visible in the text. While child support enforcement is a legitimate public interest, the mechanism here is blunt: it bars travel for anyone $2,500+ in arrears, including those in payment plans, those disputing the debt, or those facing genuine hardship, and offers no administrative remedy short of full

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record