States gain power to sue over discriminatory pricing against small business
H.R. 6830 — Fair Competition for Small Business Act of 2025 · Filed by Maxine Waters (D-CA) · 20 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 17, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Clayton Act to allow state attorneys general to sue on behalf of their citizens for damages when businesses engage in price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act. Currently, only the federal government and private parties can bring such suits; this bill adds state-level enforcement power to protect small businesses and consumers from discriminatory pricing practices.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to expand state-level antitrust enforcement authority by permitting state attorneys general to sue for damages under the Robinson-Patman Act, a price-discrimination statute. This is a straightforward expansion of existing enforcement mechanisms, not a new substantive rule.
What the text implies
- State AGs gain standing to sue for price discrimination on behalf of consumers and small businesses, potentially creating parallel enforcement tracks that could increase litigation risk for companies engaged in volume-based pricing or tiered distribution models.
- The bill may incentivize state-level antitrust enforcement activity, particularly in states with aggressive consumer-protection AGs, creating a patchwork of enforcement standards across jurisdictions.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
small businesses (potential plaintiffs/beneficiaries in state AG suits); consumer advocacy groups; antitrust law firms (increased litigation opportunity)