Congress moves to restore 23 consumer protections the CFPB quietly erased
H.R. 8777 — GUIDANCE Act of 2026 · Filed by Maxine Waters (D-CA) · Introduced May 13, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill nullifies 23 separate Trump-era CFPB actions that withdrew consumer protection guidance and rules — effectively restoring those protections. The withdrawn rules covered areas including fair credit reporting, medical debt collection, overdraft practices, whistleblower protections, lending discrimination, and protections for military servicemembers. By declaring those withdrawals to have 'no force or effect,' the bill reinstates the original consumer-protective guidance as if the withdrawals never happened.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is to void a batch of CFPB rule withdrawals, thereby reinstating consumer financial protections across credit reporting, debt collection, overdraft practices, and lending discrimination — making it a straightforward consumer protection restoration measure.
What the text implies
- The bill does not appropriate enforcement funds or direct the CFPB to actively enforce the restored guidance, so practical effect depends on whether the Bureau — whose leadership may be hostile — actually resumes enforcement activity.
- Restoring the Fair Credit Reporting Act preemption rule (item 1) could re-expand states' ability to enact stronger credit-reporting laws than federal minimums, with significant variation in consumer protections by state.
- The restoration of the ability-to-repay rule for successors-in-interest (item 9) could affect heirs who inherit mortgaged property, giving them clearer rights to assume loans — a non-obvious benefit for estate planning.
- Reinstating the contract-for-deed consumer protections (item 8) could meaningfully affect low-income homebuyers in seller-financed transactions, a market segment often targeted by predatory terms.
- The bill's legal mechanism — declaring withdrawals to have 'no force or effect' — may face administrative law challenges if courts find the original guidance was itself non-binding, potentially limiting enforceability even if enacted.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary consumers — particularly those dealing with debt collection, credit reporting errors, medical debt, overdraft fees, and discriminatory lending — would regain substantive legal protections that were stripped by the CFPB in May 2025. Financial institutions would face renewed compliance obligations, but the direct beneficiaries of restored enforcement are everyday borrowers and consumers.
Who stands to gain
- consumer advocacy organizations
- legal aid and plaintiff-side consumer law firms
- state attorneys general with consumer protection mandates
Named in the bill
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB), AIG, FBK, FMAO, PFG, PRU, House Committee on Financial Services, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Regulation Z, Regulation F, Regulation B, No Surprises Act
Where it stands
- May 13, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 13, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $540,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 139 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Maxine Waters, the sponsor, reported $453,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies — $540,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,868 characters) on Aug 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to restore 23 consumer protections the CFPB quietly erased” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8777 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.