FDIC gets new power to spend more to block mega-bank takeovers
H.R. 6547 — Least Cost Exception Act · Filed by Mike Flood (R-NE) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 10, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal banking law to allow the FDIC to resolve a failing bank using a method that costs more than the cheapest option, if doing so prevents the bank from being sold to a giant global bank and thus avoids further concentration of the U.S. banking system. The FDIC must get Federal Reserve approval, report to Congress within 30 days, and the extra cost to the insurance fund cannot exceed a threshold the FDIC will set by rule.
Why we flagged it
The bill creates a discretionary exception to the FDIC's least-cost resolution mandate, allowing regulators to spend more taxpayer money to prevent a failing bank from being acquired by a systemically important global bank. It is framed as anti-concentration policy but operates as a cost-shifting mechanism.
What the text implies
- The FDIC's cost threshold is not specified in the bill—it will be set by rule after enactment, meaning the actual fiscal exposure to the deposit insurance fund is unknown at passage.
- The exception applies only when the alternative is a sale to a 'global systemically important banking organization,' creating a carve-out that may benefit mid-sized or regional acquirers while blocking mega-bank consolidation.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Regional and mid-sized banks (potential acquirers not classified as global systemically important); Deposit insurance fund (deferred costs via assessment payments from acquirers); Failing banks (alternative to liquidation or forced sale to mega-bank)