Federal law creates 30-year liability for transgender youth medical care
H.R. 653 — Protect Minors from Medical Malpractice Act of 2025 · Filed by Brian Babin (R-TX) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 23, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal private right of action allowing minors (or their representatives) to sue medical practitioners for performing gender-transition procedures—including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries—on anyone under 18. Plaintiffs can recover compensatory damages, punitive damages, declaratory/injunctive relief, and attorney's fees up to 30 years after turning 18. The bill also bars federal HHS funding to any state that requires practitioners to perform such procedures and declares that no federal law can compel practitioners to perform them.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a federal private right of action with punitive damages and a 30-year statute of limitations, designed to create liability for a specific class of medical procedures. While framed as protecting minors from 'malpractice,' the bill does not require proof of negligence, deviation from standard of care, or causation—only that a procedure was performed and injury occurred. This is a liability expansion, not a malpractice standard.
What the text implies
- The bill's interstate commerce jurisdictional hooks (subsection (c)) are extraordinarily broad—any use of mail, email, payment systems, or instruments that have crossed state lines triggers federal jurisdiction. This means virtually every gender-transition procedure in the US falls under the bill's scope, creating a de facto federal ban despite nominally targeting only practitioners who used inter
- The 30-year statute of limitations (until age 48) is far longer than standard medical malpractice statutes (typically 2–4 years) and creates perpetual liability for practitioners, potentially deterring any practitioner from offering these services regardless of medical judgment or parental consent.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff's personal injury attorneys; medical malpractice defense firms