Teledentistry crackdown: in-person exams required, rural access threatened
H.R. 9829 — ORTHO Act · Filed by Brian Babin (R-TX) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 22, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Federal Trade Commission to issue regulations within 180 days mandating that dentists perform in-person examinations before providing most dental services via telehealth. Exceptions allow teledentistry for emergencies, public health programs, and initial orthodontic diagnoses—but even those require in-person confirmation before treatment begins. The bill empowers the FTC and state attorneys general to enforce these rules as unfair/deceptive practices, with statutory damages of $1,000 per violation (up to 3x for willful conduct) and attorney fees available to prevailing states.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a regulatory mandate requiring in-person exams before remote dental services, enforced by the FTC and state AGs. It is a straightforward safety-and-access trade-off, not a hidden carve-out or subsidy.
What the text implies
- The $1,000 statutory damages per remote visit (multiplied by number of violations) may incentivize state attorneys general to pursue high-volume enforcement actions against teledentistry platforms, potentially chilling legitimate remote-care innovation and disproportionately affecting smaller telehealth providers.
- The requirement for in-person confirmation before orthodontic appliance use may delay treatment for patients in rural or underserved areas where in-person dental access is limited, effectively restricting access to care for lower-income populations.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
traditional in-person dental practices (reduced remote competition); state attorneys general offices (enforcement authority and fee awards)