Congress restores $80M tourism fund cut by spending bill
H.R. 6202 — Brand USA Restoration Act · Filed by Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) · Introduced Nov 20, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill appropriates $80 million to the Travel Promotion Fund for fiscal year 2026 to restore funding that was cut by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The money comes from general Treasury funds and goes directly into the existing Travel Promotion Fund, which finances Brand USA, the federal agency that markets U.S. travel destinations internationally.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a direct appropriation to restore federal funding for tourism promotion. While framed as a 'restoration,' it is functionally a subsidy to the tourism and hospitality sectors, which benefit from federally funded international marketing.
What the text implies
- The bill does not explain why the One Big Beautiful Bill Act cut the Fund or whether that cut reflected a policy judgment about federal tourism spending priorities. Restoring the cut without addressing the underlying rationale may perpetuate a cycle of appropriations reversals.
- Brand USA is a quasi-public entity funded by a mix of federal appropriations and private-sector contributions. Restoring federal funding may reduce pressure on the tourism industry to self-fund its own marketing, effectively shifting costs from private to public.
- The bill references 'reductions' made by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act but does not specify the amount cut or the original Fund balance, making it difficult to assess whether $80M fully restores the Fund or represents a partial recovery.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens may benefit modestly from increased tourism promotion (job creation in hospitality, tax revenue), but the primary beneficiary is the tourism industry itself. The bill does not address whether the original cut was justified or whether $80M in federal tourism marketing represents efficient public spending versus private industry self-promotion.
Who stands to gain
- tourism and hospitality industry
- international travel and tourism operators
- hotel and airline companies
- destination marketing organizations
Named in the bill
Travel Promotion Fund, Brand USA, Travel Promotion Act of 2009, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, House Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Treasury
Where it stands
- Nov 20, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Nov 20, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Appropriations · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (344 characters) on Aug 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress restores $80M tourism fund cut by spending bill” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6202 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.