Nevada land bill exempts mineral sales from competitive bidding
H.R. 618 — Apex Area Technical Corrections Act · Filed by Steven Horsford (D-NV) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 22, 2025 · Signed
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends a 1989 Nevada law governing the Apex Project (a federal land transfer and industrial development area near Las Vegas) to add the City of North Las Vegas and the Apex Industrial Park Owners Association as eligible recipients of land transfers and mineral-sale benefits. It clarifies definitions, extends federal withdrawal protections to transferred lands in perpetuity, exempts mineral sales from competitive bidding requirements, and adds environmental-compliance conditions to future transfers.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to expand beneficiaries of a 1989 federal land-transfer statute and exempt mineral sales on those lands from competitive bidding. While framed as a technical correction, it substantively grants new entities access to federal resources and regulatory relief.
What the text implies
- Mineral sales exempted from competitive bidding (43 CFR 3602) may result in below-market-value extraction of federal minerals, reducing public revenue.
- Environmental review is made conditional on 'applicable Federal land laws' rather than mandatory, creating ambiguity about whether NEPA/FLPMA apply uniformly to all transfers.
- The Apex Industrial Park Owners Association—a private entity formed in 2001—gains parity with a municipal government in federal land-transfer decisions, blurring public/private boundaries.
- Perpetual withdrawal protection for transferred lands may lock federal land out of future public use or reclamation.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
North Las Vegas residents may benefit from local economic development and land availability, but the exemption from competitive bidding on mineral sales and reduced environmental scrutiny creates a public cost: federal mineral resources are sold without competition (potentially below market value), and environmental review is conditional rather than mandatory. The bill prioritizes local development over federal resource stewardship and public transparency.
Who stands to gain
- City of North Las Vegas (municipal government)
- Apex Industrial Park Owners Association (private landowners/developers)
- mineral extraction operators on the Apex Site
Named in the bill
City of North Las Vegas, Apex Industrial Park Owners Association, Clark County, Apex Project, Apex Site, U.S. Department of Interior (Secretary), Nevada Secretary of State, 43 CFR 3602 (federal mineral-sale regulations)
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Jan 22, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 22, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
- Feb 12, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Feb 12, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent”
- May 13, 2025 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1980-1981)”
- May 13, 2025 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended”
- Jun 18, 2025 — Passed both chambers · Congress.gov: “Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S3459)”
- Jul 3, 2025 — Sent to president · Congress.gov: “Presented to President”
- Jul 15, 2025 — Signed into law · Congress.gov: “Became Public Law No: 119-24”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $60,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 4 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Steven Horsford, the sponsor, reported $1,801,734 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Workers Injury Law & Advocacy Group — $60,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 23, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,953 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 23, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Nevada land bill exempts mineral sales from competitive bidding” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr618 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.