Federal law now shields knife carriers from state prosecution—and lets them sue states.
H.R. 60 — Knife Owners’ Protection Act of 2025 · Filed by Andy Biggs (R-AZ) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal right to transport knives across state lines for individuals not otherwise prohibited by federal law. It requires knives to be locked in containers during motor vehicle and air travel (except emergency safety knives in vehicles), allows knives to be kept accessible in temporary lodging, and bars states from arresting or detaining travelers in compliance with the bill's requirements. It also creates a private right of action allowing individuals to sue states or local officials for violations, with prevailing parties entitled to attorney's fees.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a federal preemption of state knife-transport law, coupled with a private right of action against states. It is not primarily about knife ownership (which remains state-regulated) but about removing state barriers to interstate travel with knives and creating a federal enforcement remedy.
What the text implies
- The private right of action with mandatory attorney's fees creates a litigation incentive structure that may lead to suits against states for enforcement actions that comply with the bill's own requirements, if plaintiffs dispute compliance interpretation.
- The bill's definition of 'transport' is extremely broad (includes overnight lodging, stops for food/fuel, emergencies, medical treatment) and may create ambiguity about when a knife-carrier is 'in transit' vs. 'residing' in a state, potentially shielding knife possession from state law in ways not explicitly stated.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill protects a narrow class of citizens (knife owners traveling interstate) from state-level restrictions, which is a genuine liberty interest. However, it simultaneously creates a federal private right of action with attorney's fees against states, which shifts enforcement power from prosecutors to private litigants and may chill legitimate state law enforcement, creating uncertainty about public safety authority.