QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress loosens environmental rules to speed affordable housing—at what cost?

H.R. 5798 — HOME Reform Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Flood (R-NE) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Oct 21, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Affordable Housing Deregulation & Expansion

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the HOME (Home Investment Partnerships) program to expand affordable housing supply by loosening restrictions on how jurisdictions can use federal funds, raising income eligibility thresholds to 100% of area median income, exempting certain housing projects from environmental review, and allowing infrastructure spending in non-entitlement areas. It also suspends labor and Buy America requirements for smaller projects and allows military members and heirs to bypass income limits on homeownership assistance.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is to expand the HOME program's reach and flexibility by raising income caps, loosening use restrictions, and removing environmental/labor review requirements. It is fundamentally a deregulatory reform of an existing housing program, not a new entitlement or appropriation.

What the text implies

  • Exempting infill housing and small projects from NEPA review may accelerate development in environmentally sensitive areas or displace existing communities without full environmental assessment, particularly in non-entitlement areas with less federal oversight.
  • Raising income eligibility to 100% AMI shifts the program's focus from lowest-income households (typically 50–80% AMI) to moderate-income families, potentially reducing assistance for the poorest renters while benefiting those closer to median income.
  • Allowing military members and heirs to bypass income limits creates a carve-out that may benefit higher-earning service members and inherited-property owners, narrowing the program's anti-poverty focus.
  • Suspending Section 3 (HUD Act 1968) labor requirements for projects under 50 units may reduce job-training and local hiring opportunities for disadvantaged workers, particularly in smaller jurisdictions.
  • Removing the Build America, Buy America requirement for HOME-funded projects may shift procurement to lower-cost foreign suppliers, reducing domestic manufacturing and construction jobs.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill expands access to affordable housing assistance for moderate-income families (up to 100% AMI) and streamlines project approval, potentially increasing housing supply. However, it simultaneously exempts projects from environmental review and labor protections, and allows income-limit waivers for military members and heirs—creating winners (moderate-income renters, some homebuyers, military families) and losers (workers on smaller projects, communities affected by expedited development, l

Who stands to gain

  • Real estate developers (infill and small-project exemptions reduce approval timelines)
  • Moderate-income homebuyers and renters (expanded income eligibility)
  • Military members (income-limit waivers)
  • Community land trusts and limited-equity cooperatives (new affordability mechanisms)
  • Foreign and non-domestic suppliers (BABA exemption)

Named in the bill

HOME Investment Partnerships program, Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Build America, Buy America Act, Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Section 8 rental assistance, Community housing development organizations, Public housing agencies, Armed Forces, National Guard

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.

  • Oct 21, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Oct 21, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

3 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $430,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 16 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.

Mike Flood, the sponsor, reported $1,190,756 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Building and Construction Trades Dept AFL-CIO — $280,000 on 1 filing
  • Up for Growth Action Inc — $90,000 on 2 filings
  • Firstkey Homes, LLC — $60,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 16, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (11,339 characters) on Aug 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 16, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress loosens environmental rules to speed affordable housing—at what cost?” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr5798 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.