Congress preempts state AI safeguards for five years, leaving workers and borrowers unprotected
H.R. 5388 — American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and Uniformity Act · Filed by Michael Baumgartner (R-WA) · Introduced Sep 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill establishes a national AI policy framework and imposes a 5-year moratorium on state laws that restrict AI models and systems in interstate commerce. It requires the President to submit a detailed action plan within 30 days to remove barriers to AI development, align federal governance with industry standards, and review existing AI executive orders for conflicts with the bill's pro-innovation policy. States retain authority over criminal law, their own procurement, and laws that facilitate (rather than restrict) AI deployment.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a 5-year federal preemption of state AI regulation, framed as a 'temporary moratorium' but functioning as a blanket immunity from state oversight. The action-plan requirement is largely hortatory; the real power transfer is the preemption clause, which benefits AI developers and large tech firms by eliminating fragmented state rules.
What the text implies
- The 5-year moratorium is renewable: section 5(e) directs the President to recommend whether to 'extend' it, creating a pathway for indefinite preemption if Congress does not affirmatively vote to restore state authority.
- Automated decision systems (ADS) are preempted even when they materially affect civil rights (hiring, lending, benefits). States cannot impose transparency, explainability, or bias-audit requirements on ADS during the moratorium, leaving citizens without recourse if an algorithm denies them employment or credit.
- The 'rule of construction' in 6(a)(2) permits states to enforce laws that 'facilitate' AI but prohibits those that 'regulate' it—a distinction that may be litigated for years, creating uncertainty that chills state action even within the carve-out.
- Section 5(d) directs agencies to review and potentially rescind or suspend Biden-era AI safeguards (Executive Orders 14110 and 14179) if they conflict with the bill's 'permissive' policy, effectively delegating deregulation to the executive branch without congressional re-approval.
- The bill defines AI broadly enough to cover systems used in criminal justice, employment screening, and welfare eligibility, yet provides no federal enforcement mechanism or private right of action if those systems cause harm during the moratorium.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The moratorium strips states of their ability to impose transparency, accountability, or performance standards on AI systems for five years, leaving citizens exposed to automated decision-making (hiring, lending, benefits eligibility) without state-level recourse. While the bill frames this as removing regulatory burden, it transfers power from elected state legislatures to federal agencies and private AI developers, with no guarantee that federal guardrails will materialize or be enforced durin
Who stands to gain
- large AI model developers and foundation-model companies
- technology firms deploying automated decision systems
- cloud computing and AI infrastructure providers
- venture capital and private equity firms investing in AI startups
Named in the bill
Office of Science and Technology Policy, Special Advisor for Artificial Intelligence and Crypto, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Executive Order 14110 (Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence), Executive Order 14179 (Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence), House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House Committees on Energy and Commerce, Judiciary, Education and the Workforce, Science Space and T, Senate Committees on Commerce Science and Transportation, Judiciary, Health Education Labor and Pens
Where it stands
- Sep 16, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 16, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and House Committee on Veterans' Affairs · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (11,571 characters) on Apr 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress preempts state AI safeguards for five years, leaving workers and borrowers unprotected” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr5388 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.