Congress moves to ban 'woke' AI from federal agencies—but defines neutrality itself
H.R. 5315 — FAIR Act · Filed by Harriet Hageman (R-WY) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 11, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits federal agencies from purchasing large language models (AI systems) unless they are developed according to principles requiring truthfulness, historical accuracy, scientific objectivity, and neutrality—specifically barring models that encode ideological judgments like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) principles into their responses without user prompting. The bill effectively blocks federal procurement of AI systems the sponsor views as ideologically biased.
Why we flagged it
The bill frames itself as a neutrality and accuracy mandate but operationally excludes a specific set of values (DEI) from federal AI procurement. It is not a technical standard for accuracy; it is a procurement rule that embeds the sponsor's ideological definition of what counts as 'unbiased' into federal purchasing authority.
What the text implies
- The bill does not define 'truthfulness,' 'historical accuracy,' or 'objectivity' in measurable terms, leaving enforcement to agency interpretation and creating litigation risk over what constitutes compliance.
- By excluding models that 'prioritize' DEI, the bill may inadvertently restrict procurement of systems designed to identify and mitigate algorithmic bias—a legitimate accuracy concern—if vendors frame bias-mitigation as DEI-aligned.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
AI vendors whose models align with the bill's ideological definition of neutrality; AI companies that market themselves as 'bias-free' or 'objective' without DEI-focused design