Congress moves to kill dark patterns and hidden subscription traps
H.R. 4365 — Consumer Online Payment Transparency and Integrity Act · Filed by Yvette Clarke (D-NY) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 14, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires companies that offer automatic renewals, free-to-pay conversions, or negative option features (like free trials that convert to paid subscriptions) to clearly disclose these terms, notify consumers 7+ days before charging them, obtain explicit consent annually, and provide easy cancellation methods (online, phone, email, or mail). It bans 'dark patterns'—deceptive interface designs that trick users into unwanted charges—and makes violations void, entitling consumers to refunds. The FTC enforces it.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to regulate deceptive subscription and renewal practices by imposing disclosure, consent, and cancellation requirements on merchants. It is consumer-protective regulation, not a tax measure, appropriation, or commemorative act.
What the text implies
- The 1-year implementation window may allow companies to lobby for exemptions or regulatory delays before enforcement begins.
- The FTC's rulemaking authority (section 3) is broad and may lead to additional restrictions on subscription models beyond what the statute explicitly requires.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Consumers (reduced unwanted charges and refunds); Payment processors and fintech firms (potential compliance cost offset by reduced chargeback dispute