QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal mandate: utilities must source 70% renewable power by 2036, with equity guardrails

H.R. 10489 — American Renewable Energy Act of 2026 · Filed by Yvette Clarke (D-NY) · Introduced Sep 17, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Renewable Energy Mandate with Equity…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes a federal renewable electricity standard requiring large retail electricity suppliers (those selling over 1 million megawatt-hours annually) to source an increasing percentage of their electricity from renewable sources—starting at 20% in 2027 and rising to 70% by 2036. Suppliers can comply by purchasing federal renewable electricity credits (one credit per megawatt-hour of renewable generation) or pay an alternative compliance fee of $50 per megawatt-hour (adjusted for inflation). The bill prioritizes renewable energy deployment in low-income and historically polluted communities, requiring at least 15–20% of credits to come from distributed generation and impacted communities. Revenues from alternative compliance payments flow to states for renewable energy, storage, and efficiency programs, with at least 50% benefiting disadvantaged communities.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a binding federal renewable electricity standard (RES) with escalating annual targets, structured as a market-based credit trading system. The defining feature is its explicit equity overlay: mandatory percentages of credits must come from distributed generation and impacted communities, and alternative compliance payments are directed to state funds for clean energy deployment in disadvantaged areas. This distinguishes it from a pure market-efficiency RES.

What the text implies

  • Alternative compliance payment mechanism ($50/MWh, inflation-adjusted) creates a de facto price ceiling on renewable energy; if renewable generation capacity cannot meet demand, suppliers will pay the fee rather than source credits, potentially limiting actual renewable deployment and shifting burden to state-administered programs.
  • Distributed generation requirement (15–20% of credits) may favor rooftop solar and small wind over utility-scale renewables, potentially increasing per-megawatt-hour compliance costs and creating regional deployment imbalances if distributed resources are not available in all areas.
  • State administration of alternative compliance payment funds introduces implementation risk: states with weak renewable energy markets or poor governance may underinvest in impacted communities, and the Commission's enforcement authority over state noncompliance is limited to redirecting future payments.
  • Banking provision (credits valid for up to 2 years after issuance) allows suppliers to defer compliance, potentially creating a compliance cliff in 2038–2039 if early-year credits are exhausted and renewable capacity has not scaled proportionally.
  • Qualified hydropower definition (capacity added after 2001 to pre-existing dams) is narrow and may exclude significant hydroelectric potential; biogas from farm anaerobic digestion is capped at 10% of state electricity usage, limiting that resource's contribution.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill creates concrete public benefits: accelerated renewable energy deployment, emissions reductions (especially in overburdened communities), and dedicated funding for clean energy in disadvantaged areas. However, compliance costs will likely be passed to consumers through higher electricity rates in the near term, and the alternative compliance payment mechanism ($50/MWh) may incentivize payment over actual renewable deployment if renewable generation capacity lags demand. The equity provi

Who stands to gain

  • renewable energy developers and generators (wind, solar, geothermal, biogas)
  • distributed generation installers and solar contractors
  • energy storage companies
  • energy efficiency service providers
  • state clean energy funds and programs
  • communities receiving renewable energy deployment and economic benefits

Named in the bill

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), retail electricity suppliers, renewable energy generators, states and state regulatory authorities, Indian Tribes, impacted communities, environmental justice communities, distributed generation providers, energy storage providers

Where it stands

  • Sep 17, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Sep 17, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (27,207 characters) on Sep 24, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,819 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-09-25.

“Federal mandate: utilities must source 70% renewable power by 2036, with equity guardrails” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10489 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record