QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Coast Guard gets new civilian leader, but military justice power concentrates dangerously

H.R. 4275 — Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025 · Filed by Sam Graves (R-MO) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 2, 2025 · Passed chamber

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Organizational Restructuring and Governance…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill reorganizes Coast Guard leadership by creating a new Secretary of the Coast Guard position that reports directly to the Department of Homeland Security Secretary (not to other DHS officials), establishes new oversight roles including a Chief Prosecutor and Inspector General, creates a Special Advisor position for Tribal and Native Hawaiian Affairs, and makes various operational and acquisition improvements. The Secretary gains broad authority over Coast Guard affairs while the Commandant remains the operational military leader.

Why we flagged it

The bill's primary function is restructuring Coast Guard leadership hierarchy and creating new oversight positions. While it includes acquisition and operational provisions, the core mechanism is establishing a civilian Secretary position with direct DHS reporting and new internal accountability structures.

What the text implies

  • The Chief Prosecutor's exclusive authority to determine 'covered offenses' and bind convening authorities to court-martial referrals centralizes military justice discretion in a single civilian-appointed officer, potentially reducing service members' procedural protections and command accountability.
  • The Secretary of the Coast Guard's power to 'change the title of any officer or activity' and assign duties broadly, combined with prohibition on privatizing 'primary duties,' creates ambiguity about what constitutes a primary duty and may enable mission creep or reinterpretation of Coast Guard functions.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. shipyards (vessel construction restrictions favor domestic builders); Defense contractors (acquisition improvements and service-life extension programs); Research institutions and universities (USCGC Storis research vessel memoranda of agreement)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record