Congress expands highway funding but hands Secretary broad discretion over $77B
H.R. 8870 — BUILD America 250 Act · Filed by Sam Graves (R-MO) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced May 19, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
HR 8870 authorizes $72–77 billion annually in federal highway, bridge, transit, and rail funding for fiscal years 2027–2031. It expands bridge repair programs, creates new competitive grant mechanisms for major projects, strengthens disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) certification and oversight, and adds digital infrastructure and climate resilience as eligible uses. The bill benefits states, local governments, and transportation contractors through increased federal investment and streamlined project approval processes.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is reauthorizing federal highway and transit funding with increased dollar caps and new competitive grant programs. While framed as infrastructure investment, it introduces discretionary mechanisms (100% federal cost-share waivers, interest-cost reimbursement, multiyear commitments) that concentrate decision-making power in the Secretary and may benefit large, well-capitalized projects over smaller or rural initiatives.
What the text implies
- Section 1105(7) grants the Secretary authority to waive the non-federal cost-share requirement (up to 100% federal funding) for up to 5 projects per year if environmental or permitting delays are deemed to create 'unreasonable project delay.' This discretionary power, capped at $30M per project, may concentrate federal resources on projects with political or economic prominence rather than need-ba
- Section 1108(2)(B) allows states to set aside only 20% of bridge funds for off-system (local) bridges and 25% for locally-owned bridges, with Secretary discretion to reduce these minimums. This creates risk that rural and small-municipality bridge repair needs may be underfunded relative to state highway priorities.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
highway and bridge construction contractors; engineering and design firms; transit agencies and operators