SEC loses oversight of smaller private fund advisers under new exemption
H.R. 4129 — Tailoring for Main Street’s Investors Act · Filed by Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 25, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill exempts smaller investment advisers managing private funds from federal registration requirements if they manage less than $5 billion in assets, their investors are wealthy or professional, and the funds offer no redemption rights except in emergencies. It also reduces filing frequency for advisers under $1 billion in assets from annual to biennial Form ADV submissions and requires the SEC to create a simplified short-form filing for smaller advisers.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a carve-out from SEC registration and oversight for a specific class of investment advisers. It is fundamentally a deregulatory measure dressed in language about 'tailoring' and 'Main Street,' but the exemption applies only to advisers of private funds serving wealthy investors, not retail investors.
- Section 3 reduces Form ADV filing frequency from annual to biennial for advisers under $1B AUM and mandates SEC creation of a short form—substantively unrelated to the private-fund adviser exemption in Section 2.
What the text implies
- The exemption applies only to advisers with less than $5B AUM, but the bill does not define what happens to advisers who cross that threshold—creating potential cliff effects and incentives to structure assets to stay below the cap.
- Investors in exempted private funds lose SEC registration scrutiny and public Form ADV disclosures, reducing transparency about adviser conflicts of interest, compensation, and disciplinary history.
- The biennial reporting requirement (Section 3) is weaker than current annual Form ADV filing, reducing SEC's ability to monitor adviser compliance and detect fraud in real time.
- The bill's title invokes 'Main Street investors,' but the exemption is limited to accredited investors and qualified purchasers—high-net-worth individuals, not ordinary retail investors.
- Reduced reporting burden may lower compliance costs for smaller advisers, but it also reduces the SEC's data collection capacity to identify systemic risks in the private-fund market.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
While the bill targets 'Main Street investors,' the exemption actually applies only to wealthy accredited investors and qualified purchasers in illiquid private funds. Ordinary citizens are not affected; the primary beneficiaries are smaller investment advisers who escape SEC oversight and the wealthy investors who use them. The reduced reporting burden and exemption from registration lower compliance costs for advisers but eliminate SEC registration scrutiny and public disclosure that would oth
Who stands to gain
- smaller investment advisers (under $5 billion AUM)
- private fund managers
- hedge funds and private equity firms below the $5B threshold
Named in the bill
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Investment Company Act of 1940, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Form ADV, qualified purchaser, accredited investor
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.
- Jun 25, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 25, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $100,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 1 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Andrew Garbarino, the sponsor, reported $1,912,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Castle Harlan, Inc. — $100,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,762 characters) on Sep 25, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,975 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-25.
“SEC loses oversight of smaller private fund advisers under new exemption” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr4129 Report an error