QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Interior Department ordered to fast-track coal projects by sidestepping environmental review

H.R. 4068 — Streamlining NEPA for Coal Act · Filed by Mike Collins (R-GA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 23, 2025 · Hearing held

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
55/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernEnvironmental Deregulation / Coal Industry…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Interior Secretary to identify existing and potential categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that could be used to fast-track coal production and export projects by bypassing environmental review. The Secretary must report these exclusions to Congress within 30 days, effectively creating a roadmap for federal agencies to approve coal projects with minimal environmental scrutiny.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is to identify and promote categorical exclusions that bypass environmental review specifically for coal projects. This is functionally a deregulation measure disguised as a procedural directive—it does not ban or restrict coal, but rather creates a pathway to exempt coal development from the environmental scrutiny that NEPA was designed to provide.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not mandate use of identified exclusions but creates a federal roadmap that other agencies can follow, effectively normalizing and legitimizing circumvention of NEPA review for coal projects without explicit legislative authorization to do so.
  • By framing coal acceleration as a policy goal within a NEPA directive, the bill redefines the purpose of categorical exclusions from narrow, genuinely low-impact activities to a sector-specific fast-track mechanism, potentially inviting legal challenge and setting precedent for similar carve-outs in other industries.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

coal mining companies; coal export terminal operators; coal-fired power plant operators

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record