QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Colleges must define antisemitism in conduct codes to keep federal aid

H.R. 406 — PROTECT Jewish Student and Faculty Act · Filed by Rudy Yakym (R-IN) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 15, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Campus Conduct Policy Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires colleges and universities that receive federal student aid to include in their conduct codes a definition of antisemitism and a statement prohibiting antisemitic conduct, with potential consequences of expulsion for students and termination for employees. The bill does not create new conduct rules—it mandates that institutions explicitly define and address antisemitism in existing disciplinary documents.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward regulatory requirement: it mandates that federally funded institutions include antisemitism definitions and prohibitions in conduct documents. It does not create new substantive law but rather requires explicit codification of conduct standards as a condition of federal funding.

What the text implies

  • The definition of antisemitism includes conduct directed at 'non-Jewish individuals' and 'property,' which may extend beyond traditional antisemitism and could capture speech or conduct not targeting Jews directly—potentially creating ambiguity in enforcement.
  • Institutions must incorporate this definition into 'all documents and other resources relating to student or employee conduct,' which may require revision of existing codes, grievance procedures, and disciplinary guidelines across multiple offices.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Students and employees benefit from explicit, transparent conduct standards that define antisemitism and its consequences, reducing ambiguity in disciplinary proceedings. However, the bill's definition of antisemitism—which includes conduct directed at 'non-Jewish individuals' and 'property'—may be broader than traditional antisemitism and could chill legitimate speech or political expression on campus, creating a potential chilling effect on protected speech and academic freedom.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record