Federal lands open to guns—state law decides safety rules
H.R. 9719 — Federal Lands Lawful Carry Act · Filed by Rudy Yakym (R-IN) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal firearms law to permit individuals to carry firearms on certain federal lands and facilities—including national forests, national parks, wildlife refuges, and Bureau of Land Management areas—provided they are not otherwise prohibited by law and comply with state law. The bill redefines what counts as a 'lawful purpose' for firearm possession in these exempted areas, removing a blanket federal prohibition that previously applied.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to remove a federal prohibition on firearm possession in specific federal facilities and lands, replacing it with a state-law standard. This is a deregulatory measure that expands carry rights rather than restricting them.
What the text implies
- Shifts firearm regulation from uniform federal standard to patchwork of state laws, creating inconsistent safety rules across federal lands depending on which state they are located in.
- Applies only to areas 'open to visitors and invitees,' which may include high-traffic public spaces (visitor centers, campgrounds, trailheads) where firearm presence could increase accident or conflict risk.
- Does not address liability, training, or permitting requirements—relies entirely on state law, which varies widely in rigor and enforcement.
- May create tension between federal land managers' safety authority and state-law carry rights, with unclear enforcement mechanisms if a state permits carry but a federal agency seeks to restrict it.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill expands Second Amendment rights for individuals who wish to carry firearms on federal lands, which some citizens view as a liberty gain. However, it removes a federal safety restriction that previously applied uniformly across all federal lands, potentially increasing risk in high-traffic public spaces (national parks, visitor centers) where firearm accidents or conflicts could harm other visitors. The net effect depends on whether expanded carry rights or reduced safety oversight is we
Who stands to gain
- firearms manufacturers and retailers (increased demand for carry-capable firearms and accessories)
- concealed-carry training providers (potential increase in demand for state-mandated training)
Named in the bill
Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, National Forest System, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, Tennessee Valley Authority, United States Army Corps of Engineers, 18 U.S.C. § 930
Where it stands
18 cosponsors: 18 Republicans.
- Jul 16, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jul 16, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,082 characters) on Sep 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,342 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-09-18.
“Federal lands open to guns—state law decides safety rules” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9719 Report an error