Congress orders independent audit of cattle disease program
H.R. 388 — Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program Enhancement Act · Filed by Mónica De La Cruz (R-TX) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 14, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the U.S. Department of Agriculture to hire an independent college or university to review the federal Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program within one year, evaluating its effectiveness at preventing tick-borne disease in cattle, the benefits and compliance burdens on ranchers, treatment protocols, and federal/state funding. The USDA must then report findings and recommendations to Congress within a year of the review's completion.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate an independent review and reporting requirement for an existing USDA animal-health program. It is a transparency and accountability measure, not a substantive policy change to the program itself.
What the text implies
- The review may surface compliance-cost data that could pressure USDA to streamline or reduce regulatory requirements on cattle producers, potentially weakening disease-control measures if recommendations are adopted without scientific safeguards.
- Delegating the review to academic institutions creates a dependency on land-grant and agricultural colleges, which may have institutional interests in maintaining or expanding agricultural research funding tied to the program.
- The bill does not mandate that USDA act on the review's recommendations, so the reporting requirement may be performative without enforcement mechanism.
Who it affects
The bill mandates independent oversight and transparency of a livestock disease-control program, requiring documented evaluation of both its public-health effectiveness and the regulatory burden on farmers. This increases accountability and may lead to more efficient program design that balances disease prevention with reduced compliance costs for ranchers.
Who stands to gain
- land-grant universities and agricultural colleges (contract revenue for review)
- cattle producers (potential compliance-cost reduction if recommendations are adopted)
Named in the bill
USDA (Department of Agriculture), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Texas Animal Health Commission, House Committee on Agriculture, Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, land-grant colleges and universities, non-land-grant colleges of agriculture
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Jan 14, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 14, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Agriculture · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress orders independent audit of cattle disease program” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr388 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.