Federal housing bill strips local zoning power, bans affordable-housing mandates
H.R. 9625 — Freedom to Build Act · Filed by Mónica De La Cruz (R-TX) · Introduced Jul 9, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a voluntary 'Freedom to Build' designation that HUD awards to localities that either adopt at least 3 regulatory reforms from each of three categories (construction innovation, faster permitting, and property-rights protections) or demonstrate sustained housing supply growth. Designated localities receive priority in HUD competitive grants and are encouraged to receive priority in federal infrastructure and transportation grants. The reforms include aligning building codes with national standards, streamlining permitting with binding timelines, prohibiting rent control, banning mandatory affordable-housing set-asides without density bonuses, and eliminating local energy and workforce mandates.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a voluntary designation that rewards localities for adopting pro-development regulatory reforms and penalizes those that maintain local land-use, labor, and environmental controls. It is functionally a federal incentive structure designed to override local zoning and affordability policy in favor of builder flexibility and housing supply growth.
What the text implies
- The bill's 'property rights' category explicitly prohibits mandatory affordable-housing set-asides unless offset by density bonuses or fee waivers, effectively eliminating inclusionary zoning as a tool for low-income housing production in designated localities.
- Federal grant prioritization for designated localities creates a financial incentive for communities to adopt reforms, but the reforms themselves are non-negotiable—localities cannot pick and choose; they must adopt at least 3 from each category or meet supply targets, limiting genuine local choice.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
residential real estate developers and builders; modular and prefabricated construction companies; property management and real estate investment firms