QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

VA must contact veterans annually for mental health care—with accountability built in

H.R. 3863 — VA Mental Health Outreach and Engagement Act · Filed by Nicole (Nikki) Budzinski (D-IL) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 10, 2025 · Reported out

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
Veterans Mental Health Outreach Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the VA to contact veterans with service-connected mental health disabilities at least once per year to offer mental health consultations and discuss available services. The VA must use phone calls, texts, emails, or letters to reach out, and must report annually to Congress on the success rates of each outreach method. The bill also includes a technical redesignation of a section of the VA code and a modification to housing loan fees (details truncated in the provided text).

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to establish a mandatory annual mental health consultation and outreach program for VA-compensated veterans with mental health service-connected disabilities. It is a public-health and veterans-benefit measure, not a market-facing or deregulatory instrument.

  • Section 3 modifies housing loan fees under 38 USC 3729(2), substantively unrelated to mental health outreach. Text is truncated, but the provision appears disconnected from the bill's stated purpose.

What the text implies

  • The bill mandates contact attempts via multiple channels (phone, text, email, letter) but does not specify data-security or privacy protections for contact information, potentially exposing veteran personal data to broader VA systems or third-party vendors if the VA contracts outreach services.
  • Annual reporting requirements create a four-year data collection burden on the VA; if outreach methods prove ineffective, the bill does not authorize additional funding or mandate corrective action, risking a compliance-theater outcome.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

pharmaceutical companies (BMY, PFE, JNJ) — increased mental health diagnoses and treatment engagemen; DVA (DaVita HealthCare Partners) — if VA contracts mental health services to private providers; GH (Guardant Health) — if mental health data analytics or health-information systems are procured

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record