Congress strips D.C. courts of power to defer to Mayor's legal interpretations
H.R. 3766 — To prohibit the District of Columbia from requiring tribunals in court or administrative proceedings in the District of Columbia to defer to the Mayor of the District of Columbia's interpretation of statutes and regulations, and for other purposes. · Filed by Harriet Hageman (R-WY) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 5, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits Washington, D.C. courts and administrative tribunals from deferring to the Mayor's interpretation of D.C. statutes and regulations when reviewing the Mayor's decisions or agency rules. It repeals D.C. Law 26–37 (the Review of Agency Action Clarification Amendment Act of 2025), which had established such deference. The effect is to require D.C. judges and hearing officers to apply their own independent judgment when interpreting D.C. law, rather than accepting the Mayor's reading as controlling.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a prohibition on judicial deference to executive interpretation—a structural check on executive power. It is fundamentally about the separation of powers and the role of courts in reviewing government action, not a tax, spending, or regulatory carve-out.
What the text implies
- Repealing D.C. Law 26–37 may increase litigation volume and duration in D.C. courts, as judges must now independently interpret every statute and regulation rather than applying a presumption of deference to executive interpretation.
- The bill may create inconsistency in D.C. administrative law: agencies will no longer receive deference in their own interpretations, potentially leading to conflicting rulings across different tribunals on the same legal question.
- D.C. residents gain a stronger check on mayoral power, but the Mayor's ability to implement policy efficiently may be constrained if courts frequently reject the Mayor's legal reasoning without a deference framework.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
D.C. residents gain judicial independence and a check on executive power: courts can no longer be required to rubber-stamp the Mayor's legal interpretations, strengthening the separation of powers and citizens' ability to challenge government action. However, the bill removes a streamlining mechanism that may have reduced litigation costs and delays, creating a modest offsetting cost.
Named in the bill
District of Columbia, Mayor of the District of Columbia, D.C. courts, D.C. administrative tribunals, D.C. Law 26–37 (Review of Agency Action Clarification Amendment Act of 2025), House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Rep. Hageman, Rep. Fitzgerald
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jun 5, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 5, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform”
- Dec 2, 2025 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Dec 2, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 19”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,374 characters) on Aug 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress strips D.C. courts of power to defer to Mayor's legal interpretations” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3766 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.