FERC gains veto power over EPA rules during power shortages
H.R. 3616 — Reliable Power Act · Filed by Troy Balderson (R-OH) · 20 cosponsors · Introduced May 29, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to conduct annual assessments of whether the U.S. bulk-power system has enough generation capacity to meet electricity demand reliably. If FERC finds a generation shortfall, it must notify other federal agencies—including EPA and DOE—and those agencies must submit any pending regulations affecting power generation to FERC for review and comment before finalizing them. Agencies cannot finalize such regulations unless they respond to FERC's concerns in writing and FERC determines the rule won't significantly harm grid reliability.
Why we flagged it
The bill's stated purpose is grid-reliability coordination, but its operative mechanism creates a conditional veto over EPA and other environmental/climate regulations whenever FERC declares a generation shortfall. This is functionally a deregulatory tool wrapped in reliability language.
What the text implies
- FERC's 'generation inadequacy' determination is not defined by statute—FERC sets the threshold, creating discretionary power to trigger regulatory review of EPA rules without congressional input.
- The 90-day submission window and requirement that agencies respond to FERC comments before finalizing rules creates a de facto veto gate for environmental regulations, even if FERC's objections are not binding in law.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
electric utilities; fossil-fuel generation companies; coal and natural-gas producers