Federal grants help police officers afford shift-compatible child care
H.R. 3304 — Providing Child Care for Police Officers Act of 2025 · Filed by Scott Peters (D-CA) · 42 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal grant program through the Department of Health and Human Services to help states and local law enforcement agencies establish and operate child care services tailored to police officers' shift work and irregular hours. The grants fund startup costs, provider training, facility construction, and direct financial assistance to officers for child care, with at least 20% of funds reserved for smaller police departments. Lead agencies must match federal funds with local contributions (10–33% depending on year), and the program runs through 2030 with $24 million authorized annually.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a targeted federal grant program designed to address a specific workforce challenge (child care access for shift-work police officers) through direct funding and local partnership. It is not a tax measure, deregulation, or commemorative act—it is a straightforward appropriations-backed service-delivery program.
What the text implies
- The 20% set-aside for small police departments (under 200 officers) may create administrative complexity and unequal per-capita funding across jurisdictions, potentially disadvantaging mid-sized departments.
- The matching requirement (10–33% local contribution) may be difficult for rural or economically distressed jurisdictions, effectively limiting program reach to better-resourced areas.
- The bill's focus on law enforcement officers may implicitly exclude other first responders (firefighters, paramedics) with similar shift-work child care needs, though the 4-year study is designed to examine this gap.
- Private child care providers receiving funds through this program are subject to federal compliance requirements (sections 658P, 98.41, 98.43) but the bill does not specify enforcement mechanisms if providers fail to meet standards.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill directly funds a public good (child care access) for a specific workforce (law enforcement) facing genuine operational barriers (shift work incompatible with standard child care hours). The matching requirement ensures local buy-in and sustainability. No restrictions on citizens' rights, remedies, or protections are imposed; the mechanism is straightforward grant distribution with audit and accountability provisions.
Who stands to gain
- child care providers (direct funding for program operation)
- construction and renovation contractors (facility improvement funds)
- child care resource and referral organizations (contract opportunities)
- local health departments (contract opportunities)
Named in the bill
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, law enforcement agencies, child care providers, lead agencies (state/territorial child care coordinators), Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990, Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
Where it stands
42 cosponsors: 21 Democrats, 20 Republicans, 1 Independents.
- May 8, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 8, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Education and Workforce and House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $90,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 31 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Scott Peters, the sponsor, reported $1,197,250 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Peace Officers Research Association of California — $50,000 on 1 filing
- International Union of Police Associations AFL-CIO — $40,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 19, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,148 characters) on Sep 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 19, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal grants help police officers afford shift-compatible child care” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3304 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.