Congress opens Medicare to digital health products with no price controls
H.R. 3288 — Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act of 2025 · Filed by Kevin Hern (R-OK) · 10 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires Medicare and Medicaid to cover prescription digital therapeutics—software-based medical products cleared by the FDA—starting January 1, 2026. It directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish payment rates for these products within one year, create billing codes within two years, and require manufacturers to report pricing and usage data annually, with penalties up to $10,000 per day for false reporting.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to establish Medicare/Medicaid coverage and reimbursement pathways for a new category of FDA-cleared digital products. It is fundamentally a market-access and payment-methodology bill, not a consumer-protection or cost-control measure.
What the text implies
- The bill anchors Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement to 'actual list charge' (the first publicly available price), giving manufacturers strong incentive to set high initial prices. No explicit price-negotiation or cost-effectiveness review is required before coverage begins.
- Manufacturers must report private-payor pricing and volume data to CMS, but this data is treated as confidential (like drug pricing under section 1927). This may limit transparency about whether government reimbursement rates are benchmarked to competitive private-market prices or inflated by manufacturer list prices.
- The bill does not require clinical-effectiveness or comparative-effectiveness review before Medicare coverage, unlike some traditional medical devices. Coverage is automatic for any FDA-cleared product meeting the definition, potentially including products with limited real-world evidence.
- Medicaid coverage is mandated but payment rates are not specified in the bill—states may face pressure to reimburse at rates set by Medicare, potentially straining state budgets without explicit appropriation.
- The definition of 'prescription digital therapeutic' is narrow (must be FDA-cleared under specific sections and exempt from certain device regulations), which may exclude many digital health products and create a protected market for products that meet the definition.
Who it affects
Patients gain access to FDA-cleared digital treatments through Medicare/Medicaid, potentially lowering out-of-pocket costs and expanding treatment options. However, the bill creates a new payment pathway with minimal price controls, allowing manufacturers to set initial list prices that become the baseline for government reimbursement, potentially inflating costs to taxpayers and beneficiaries.
Who stands to gain
- Digital therapeutics manufacturers (e.g., Livongo/Teladoc, Omada Health, Proteus Digital Health, Can
- FDA-cleared digital health device companies
- Health insurance intermediaries managing digital benefit administration
Named in the bill
Medicare, Medicaid, HHS Secretary, FDA, CMS, Livongo (HUM), Legend Biotech (LGND), Boston Scientific (BSX), Align Technology (ALGN), GEN (Genmab or Genesis Energy, context unclear), Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS)
Where it stands
10 cosponsors: 6 Democrats, 4 Republicans.
- May 8, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 8, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means and House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $160,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 4 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Kevin Hern, the sponsor, reported $2,075,651 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy — $160,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 19, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 19, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress opens Medicare to digital health products with no price controls” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3288 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.