Tax break for precious-metals funds benefits wealthy investors
H.R. 9060 — Precious Metals Parity Act · Filed by Kevin Hern (R-OK) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced May 29, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the tax code to allow regulated investment companies (mutual funds, ETFs) to count income from precious metals (gold, silver, platinum, palladium) as 'qualifying income' for tax purposes. Currently, such companies can only count income from stocks, bonds, and foreign currencies as qualifying; treating precious metals the same removes a tax disadvantage for funds that hold or trade bullion.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative effect is to extend a specific tax classification (qualifying income for RICs) to a single asset class (precious metals bullion). It is a targeted tax preference, not a broad policy reform or public-interest measure.
What the text implies
- The bill may increase demand for precious-metals ETFs and mutual funds by making them tax-advantaged relative to direct bullion ownership, potentially benefiting fund sponsors and precious-metals dealers.
- RICs holding precious metals will face lower effective tax rates, reducing federal tax revenue; the cost is distributed across all taxpayers but the benefit concentrates among precious-metals fund investors.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
regulated investment companies (RICs) holding precious metals; precious-metals ETF and mutual fund sponsors; investors in precious-metals funds