Congress funds rural broadband—but ties affordability to fragile federal programs
H.R. 3119 — ReConnecting Rural America Act of 2025 · Filed by Zachary (Zach) Nunn (R-IA) · 19 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 30, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Rural Electrification Act to create a $650 million annual grant and loan program (through 2030) to help rural communities build broadband infrastructure. Eligible entities—including local governments, cooperatives, tribes, and private companies—can apply for funding to deploy high-speed internet (100 Mbps download/upload) in areas where at least 75% of households lack such service. Priority goes to the poorest areas, tribal lands, and communities with outmigration; grants (not loans) are reserved for tribal organizations, colonias, persistent-poverty counties, and the most underserved territories. The bill also funds technical assistance and requires participating providers to offer affordable internet plans.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal grant and loan program to fund broadband deployment in underserved rural areas, with explicit affordability and equity requirements. This is straightforward infrastructure investment, not deregulation, tax relief, or a hidden carve-out.
What the text implies
- The 15% cap on large telecom providers may inadvertently favor smaller regional carriers and cooperatives, potentially fragmenting rural broadband markets and creating interoperability challenges.
- Requirement to participate in Affordable Connectivity Program or Lifeline creates dependency on federal subsidy programs; if those programs sunset, rural broadband affordability could collapse despite infrastructure investment.
- The 5-year buildout deadline and 25-year loan repayment horizon create long-term fiscal obligations for small municipalities and cooperatives, which may struggle with debt service if subscriber uptake is lower than projected.
- Rescission of unobligated balances from the 2018 appropriations act may disrupt ongoing projects or commitments made under the prior program, though the bill immediately re-appropriates the same amount.
Who it affects
Rural households and small communities gain direct access to broadband infrastructure and subsidized internet service, addressing a documented public-health and economic-development gap. The bill prioritizes the poorest and most isolated areas, includes affordability requirements, and uses public funds for public benefit rather than private profit extraction.
Who stands to gain
- rural electric cooperatives
- municipal broadband authorities
- regional telecom providers
- construction and engineering firms
- equipment manufacturers (fiber, wireless infrastructure)
Named in the bill
USDA Rural Utilities Service, Department of Labor, FCC, NTIA, Tribal organizations, Rural Electrification Act of 1936, Affordable Connectivity Program, Lifeline program, Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act
Where it stands
19 cosponsors: 11 Democrats, 8 Republicans.
- Apr 30, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 30, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Appropriations and House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
5 lobbying clients named this bill on 9 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $9,275,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 28 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 78% of bills with at least one filing.
Zachary (Zach) Nunn, the sponsor, reported $1,895,327 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Ncta - the Internet & Television Association — $6,870,000 on 2 filings
- National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (nreca) — $1,750,000 on 2 filings
- National Telecommunications Cooperative Association — $370,000 on 2 filings
- Wta -- Advocates for Rural Broadband — $225,000 on 2 filings
- Fiber Broadband Association — $60,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
- H.R. 3119 on Congress.gov
- Actions and status history
- Cosponsors (19)
- Ncta - the Internet & Television Association — LDA filing, 2025 Q4
- National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (nreca) — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- National Telecommunications Cooperative Association — LDA filing, 2026 Q2
- Zachary (Zach) Nunn — FEC candidate receipts, 2026 cycle
“Congress funds rural broadband—but ties affordability to fragile federal programs” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3119 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.