Congress votes to strip pensions from members expelled or found to have committed misconduct.

What it does

This bill strips congressional pensions from members who are expelled from Congress or who resign after an ethics investigation finds substantial evidence of misconduct. Expelled members lose all credit for their service toward retirement benefits; resigning members lose pension credit if an ethics committee adopts a formal allegation of violation before they leave. Members get back only their own contributions, not employer matching or government contributions to retirement savings. Citizens benefit by ensuring that members who commit serious misconduct do not collect taxpayer-funded pensions for that service.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a forfeiture of pension benefits tied to ethics violations or expulsion—a direct accountability measure that restrains government officials' access to public funds. It is not a tax provision, subsidy, or deregulation; it is a penalty mechanism for misconduct.

What the text implies

• The bill applies only prospectively (to acts committed after enactment), so sitting members with past misconduct are not affected unless they are expelled or resign after a new ethics finding.
• Resignation before an ethics finding is adopted avoids the pension forfeiture—members can resign to escape the penalty if they act before the committee votes.
• Presidential pardon or commutation does not restore forfeited pensions, creating a permanent bar even if criminal conviction is later pardoned.
• Government contributions to Thrift Savings Plan (employer match) are forfeited under FERS but not explicitly addressed in CSRS, creating potential asymmetry in retirement savings loss.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill restricts a financial benefit (congressional pensions) flowing to members who have been expelled or found by ethics committees to have committed serious misconduct. Taxpayers stop funding pensions for members whose conduct violated official standards, and the forfeiture creates a concrete accountability mechanism tied to ethics findings. This is a restraint on government officials' access to public money, not a restraint on citizens' rights or protections.

Named in the bill

Office of Personnel Management, Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives, Select Committee on Ethics of the Senate, Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), Thrift Savings Plan

Where it stands

3 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 1 Republicans.

• Sep 3, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
• Sep 3, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and House Committee on House Administration · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.