Medicare expands rural telehealth payments without proving it saves money
H.R. 3108 — RPM Access Act · Filed by David Kustoff (R-TN) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 30, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill increases Medicare reimbursement for remote patient monitoring (RPM) services—devices and systems that track patients' vital signs from home—by setting a floor on geographic payment adjustments so rural and underserved areas receive at least the national average rate starting January 2026. It also requires RPM providers to have real-time physician oversight, use compatible electronic health records, and report cost-savings data to Congress, with a 5-year evaluation of whether RPM actually reduces hospitalizations and medication non-adherence.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a payment floor for RPM geographic indices, explicitly non-budget-neutral, paired with quality and reporting requirements. It is a targeted reimbursement increase for a specific service category, not a broad reform or a hidden rider.
What the text implies
- The non-budget-neutral payment floor will increase total Medicare spending without a corresponding offset, potentially raising premiums or reducing funding for other services unless Congress appropriates additional funds.
- The bill's success depends entirely on whether RPM actually reduces hospitalizations and improves medication adherence—outcomes that are not guaranteed and will not be known until the 5-year report is due, creating a lag in accountability.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
remote patient monitoring device manufacturers; RPM service providers and vendors; healthcare systems and practices offering RPM