State Department gets power to strip tax status without public evidence
H.R. 6800 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to terminate the tax-exempt status of terrorist supporting organizations. · Filed by David Kustoff (R-TN) · Introduced Dec 17, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the tax code to allow the Secretary of State (with the Attorney General's concurrence) to designate organizations as 'terrorist supporting organizations' and strip their tax-exempt status if they provided material support to designated terrorist groups in the prior 3 years. Organizations get 90 days' notice and a chance to cure (prove they didn't provide support, return it, or certify they won't do so again), and can challenge the designation in federal court or through IRS appeals.
Why we flagged it
The bill's functional purpose is to grant the State Department and Attorney General unilateral authority to revoke tax-exempt status based on a designation of 'material support' to terrorism, with limited judicial review and classified-information secrecy. It is not primarily a tax policy; it is a counterterrorism enforcement mechanism that uses the tax code as the lever.
What the text implies
- The Secretary of State can designate an organization as 'terrorist supporting' based on classified evidence the organization never sees, then the organization has only 90 days to 'cure' or face permanent loss of tax-exempt status—creating a chilling effect on legitimate advocacy, humanitarian work, or political speech if the designation is erroneous or politically motivated.
- The bill allows the State Department to withhold the description of 'material support' from the designated organization on national-security grounds, meaning the organization cannot effectively rebut the allegation or know what conduct triggered the designation.
- A single certification that an organization 'will not provide further support' is valid only once per 5 years; repeated designations could trap an organization in perpetual jeopardy even if it cures the first time.
- The bill does not require the underlying terrorist organization to be formally designated under 18 U.S.C. § 2331 or any other statute; the State Department can designate based on its own determination that an organization is 'described in paragraph (8)(B)' (a foreign terrorist organization), creating a two-step executive process with no statutory definition of what qualifies.
- Judicial review is available but only AFTER designation; the organization loses tax-exempt status immediately upon designation, and the burden appears to be on the organization to prove the designation was erroneous, not on the government to prove it was correct.
Who it affects
The bill serves a legitimate public interest—preventing tax-exempt status from shielding organizations that fund terrorism. However, it concentrates extraordinary power in the executive branch (State Department + Attorney General) to designate organizations without requiring a judicial finding of wrongdoing first, and allows national-security secrecy to withhold evidence from the organization being designated, creating asymmetric due process.
Named in the bill
Secretary of State, Attorney General, Internal Revenue Service, IRS Independent Office of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, 18 U.S.C. § 2339B, Classified Information Procedures Act
Where it stands
- Dec 17, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Dec 17, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
6 lobbying clients named this bill on 9 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,387,229 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 82% of bills with at least one filing.
David Kustoff, the sponsor, reported $1,066,250 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Genworth Financial, Inc. — $903,059 on 2 filings
- National Council of Nonprofits (formerly Known As the National Council of Nonpro — $181,170 on 2 filings
- Care Action Now, Inc. — $133,000 on 2 filings
- National Council of Nonprofits — $80,000 on 1 filing
- Council on Foundations — $60,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 5, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“State Department gets power to strip tax status without public evidence” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr6800 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.