QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to ban surveillance cameras in public housing

H.R. 3060 — No Biometric Barriers to Housing Act of 2025 · Filed by Yvette Clarke (D-NY) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 29, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Tenant Privacy Protection

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits owners of federally subsidized rental housing (public housing, Section 8, and similar programs) from using facial recognition, fingerprint scanning, or other biometric surveillance technology on tenants or in common areas, effective one year after enactment. It requires HUD to report on any past use of these technologies and their effects on tenants, particularly vulnerable populations.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to protect renters in subsidized housing from biometric surveillance and the discrimination risks it enables. It is a civil-rights and privacy measure, not a market intervention or subsidy.

What the text implies

  • The 1-year grace period allows current biometric systems to remain operational during transition, potentially delaying full compliance and leaving tenants exposed to surveillance for 12 months post-enactment.
  • The bill applies only to federally assisted housing; private landlords remain free to deploy biometric surveillance, creating a two-tier privacy regime that may incentivize low-income tenants to avoid federal programs.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Low-income renters in federally assisted housing gain explicit protection against invasive surveillance that could enable discrimination or privacy violations. The prohibition prevents landlords from using biometric data to screen, track, or deny housing access based on algorithmic bias, while the reporting requirement creates transparency about past abuses.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record