QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates federal research agencies boost graduate researcher pay

H.R. 3054 — RESEARCHER Act · Filed by Jennifer McClellan (D-VA) · 21 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 29, 2025 · Referred to committee

92%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Research Workforce Support Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to create federal guidelines within six months to help address financial hardship among graduate students and postdoctoral researchers who conduct federally funded research. The guidelines will recommend ways to increase stipends, improve access to healthcare, housing, food security, and childcare, with special attention to rural and underserved areas. Federal research agencies must then adopt policies based on these guidelines and report on progress; the bill also funds data collection and an independent National Academies study to track whether researchers' stipends keep pace with living costs.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to establish federal policy guidelines and funding mechanisms to improve the financial stability of graduate and postdoctoral researchers through higher stipends, benefits access, and data-driven assessment. It is a targeted public investment in human capital within the research enterprise.

What the text implies

  • Indexing stipends to local cost-of-living may create regional wage variation in federal research funding, potentially affecting researcher mobility and geographic distribution of research talent.
  • Mandatory data collection disaggregated by demographics may reveal disparities in researcher compensation and financial instability by race, gender, or other protected categories, creating pressure for corrective action.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

graduate researchers (stipend increases); postdoctoral researchers (stipend increases and rural area bonuses); institutions of higher education (indirect, through researcher recruitment and retention)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record