QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates mental health crisis coverage across all federal insurance programs

H.R. 10240 — Behavioral Health Crisis Services Expansion Act of 2026 · Filed by Jennifer McClellan (D-VA) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 3, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Behavioral Health Crisis Coverage Expansion

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill expands mental health and substance use crisis services coverage across Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, TRICARE, VA, federal employee health plans, and CHIP. It defines crisis response services to include mobile crisis teams, crisis stabilization facilities (providing 23–48 hour observation and psychiatric beds), and urgent care walk-in facilities. Medicare will cover these services at 80% of the lesser of actual charge or a Secretary-determined rate; Medicaid must cover them as a mandatory benefit; private insurers and group health plans must cover them without separate cost-sharing or treatment limits stricter than medical/surgical benefits. Implementation begins 3 years after enactment.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is straightforward: it mandates coverage of crisis response services across six insurance programs (Medicare, Medicaid, private, VA, TRICARE, CHIP, FEHB) and defines the services and payment terms. The title accurately describes the function.

What the text implies

  • The 3-year implementation delay may leave gaps in crisis response capacity during the transition period, particularly in rural or underserved areas where infrastructure is not yet in place.
  • Secretary-determined payment rates for crisis response services are not specified in the bill; actual reimbursement adequacy will depend on regulatory action and may affect provider participation and service availability.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

mental health and substance use service providers; crisis stabilization facility operators; mobile crisis response teams

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record