Congress moves to strengthen worker safety protections and OSHA enforcement
H.R. 3036 — Protecting America’s Workers Act · Filed by Joe Courtney (D-CT) · 42 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 28, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill significantly strengthens worker protections under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) by expanding whistleblower protections, increasing penalties for safety violations, requiring faster reporting of workplace injuries and deaths, and giving workers and their families greater rights in safety investigations. It makes it harder for employers to retaliate against workers who report unsafe conditions, raises civil and criminal penalties for violations, and requires OSHA to investigate all workplace fatalities and serious incidents.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to expand OSHA enforcement, worker retaliation protections, and employer penalties. It is substantively a labor-protective measure, not a deregulatory or corporate-benefit bill. The title accurately reflects the mechanism.
What the text implies
- Employers will face significantly higher compliance costs due to mandatory injury reporting, investigation cooperation, and penalty exposure. Small employers with limited safety infrastructure may struggle more than large firms with dedicated compliance teams.
- The bill creates a new private right of action for workers to sue in federal court if OSHA administrative processes stall, potentially increasing litigation volume and employer legal costs.
- State OSHA plans will be subject to new federal oversight and evaluation standards, potentially reducing state autonomy in occupational safety administration.
- Criminal penalties now extend to corporate officers and directors personally, not just the employer entity, creating individual liability exposure for executives.
- The requirement that employers maintain site logs for all recordable injuries at multi-employer worksites shifts liability and documentation burden to the site-controlling employer, potentially creating disputes over who bears responsibility.
Who it affects
Ordinary workers gain substantial new protections: stronger retaliation safeguards, faster injury reporting, the right to participate in safety investigations, and access to legal remedies including attorney fees. Employers face higher penalties and stricter enforcement, but these costs reflect the public interest in workplace safety. The bill shifts power toward workers and transparency.
Who stands to gain
- occupational safety consultants and compliance firms
- workers' compensation insurers (may see reduced claims if safety improves)
- plaintiff employment attorneys
- OSHA administrative and investigative staff (expanded budget/hiring)
Named in the bill
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration), Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), State occupational safety and health plans, U.S. Court of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
Where it stands
42 cosponsors: 42 Democrats.
- Apr 28, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Apr 28, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Education and Workforce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,206,377 in lobbying spend. A filing names 101 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Joe Courtney, the sponsor, reported $451,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- AFL-CIO — $760,000 on 1 filing
- United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers — $230,000 on 1 filing
- Associated General Contractors of America — $216,377 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 16, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to strengthen worker safety protections and OSHA enforcement” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr3036 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.