Coast Guard gets faster authority to share services with state, local governments
H.R. 10308 — Strengthening Coast Guard Communities Act of 2026 · Filed by Joe Courtney (D-CT) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 8, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows the Commandant of the Coast Guard to enter into intergovernmental support agreements (deals with state and local governments to share services and resources) using the same authority that the Secretary of Defense already has under federal law. The Commandant must notify Congress within 60 days of using this power. The bill streamlines Coast Guard operations by letting it negotiate shared-services arrangements with other government entities without requiring separate legislative approval each time.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole function is to transfer an existing administrative power from the Defense Secretary to the Coast Guard Commandant, enabling more flexible negotiation of shared-services agreements with state and local governments. It is a routine delegation of authority, not a policy change or appropriation.
What the text implies
- The 60-day notification requirement is post-hoc and non-binding — Congress cannot block an agreement after the Commandant has already entered it, only be informed of it.
- The bill does not require competitive bidding, cost-benefit analysis, or public comment on intergovernmental agreements, leaving terms entirely to executive discretion.
- Delegation of this authority may enable the Coast Guard to bypass certain procurement or appropriations requirements that would otherwise apply to service contracts with private vendors.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The delegation may improve operational efficiency and reduce costs through shared services, benefiting taxpayers and communities hosting Coast Guard installations. However, the bill creates no enforceable public benefit, no transparency mechanism beyond a 60-day notification to Congress, and no guarantee that cost savings flow to citizens rather than being retained by the agencies. The civic gain is speculative; the delegation is real.
Named in the bill
Coast Guard, Commandant of the Coast Guard, Secretary of Defense, 10 U.S.C. § 2679, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 5, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Sep 8, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Sep 8, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (965 characters) on Sep 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,522 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-09-21.
“Coast Guard gets faster authority to share services with state, local governments” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr10308 Report an error