QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Navy gets 6 extra months to classify ship work as temporary

H.R. 2955 — Smart Ship Repair Act of 2025 · Filed by Scott Peters (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 17, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Defense Contracting Procedural Amendment

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill changes federal law to allow the Navy to classify work on combat and escort ships as 'short-term' if it lasts up to 18 months instead of the current 12-month limit. This affects how the Navy assigns vessel construction and repair projects, potentially allowing longer contracts to be treated as temporary work.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a narrow technical amendment to Navy contracting rules, not a substantive policy change. It modifies the definition of 'short-term work' to extend the threshold by 6 months, affecting how the Navy classifies and assigns vessel projects.

What the text implies

  • Extending the short-term work threshold from 12 to 18 months may allow the Navy to avoid certain labor protections, union requirements, or competitive bidding rules that apply to longer-term contracts, depending on how 10 U.S.C. § 8669a structures those protections.
  • The change could reduce the frequency of project re-bidding or reassignment, potentially favoring incumbent contractors and reducing competition for Navy ship work.
  • If the 12-month threshold was tied to apprenticeship, training, or workforce development requirements, extending it to 18 months may delay or reduce those obligations.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill expands Navy operational flexibility in managing ship construction contracts, which could improve efficiency or reduce costs, but the civic effect depends on whether this change increases competition, preserves labor protections, or instead enables cost-cutting that harms workers or reduces accountability in defense contracting. The text alone does not reveal the downstream impact.

Who stands to gain

  • Navy ship construction contractors
  • Defense shipbuilders (e.g., General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Bath Iron Works)

Named in the bill

U.S. Navy, Department of Defense, 10 U.S.C. § 8669a, combatant vessels, escort vessels

Where it stands

2 cosponsors: 2 Republicans.

  • Apr 17, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Apr 17, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (317 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Navy gets 6 extra months to classify ship work as temporary” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr2955 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.