Congress offers $100M bounty on Maduro—using frozen Venezuelan assets, not taxpayer money.
H.R. 268 — STOP MADURO Act · Filed by Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 9, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill increases the maximum reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro from the standard State Department reward cap to $100 million. The money would come exclusively from frozen Venezuelan government assets already seized by the U.S. under existing sanctions laws, not from the general federal budget.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a targeted sanctions-enforcement mechanism using seized assets to incentivize intelligence collection against a designated foreign adversary. It is not a general appropriation, tax measure, or commemorative act—it is a narrowly scoped reward authorization tied to existing asset seizures.
What the text implies
- The bill does not define what constitutes a valid 'conviction' of Maduro—it is unclear whether a conviction by a third country, an international tribunal, or a U.S. court would qualify, creating ambiguity about when the $100M payment obligation is triggered.
- No sunset clause or expiration date is specified; the reward authorization appears permanent, potentially creating indefinite liability against seized assets.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill uses already-seized foreign assets (not taxpayer money) to incentivize intelligence that could disrupt a regime credibly linked to narco-trafficking, which serves a legitimate national security interest. However, the mechanism—a massive bounty on a foreign leader—raises questions about whether it advances U.S.