Congress mandates Muslim Brotherhood terror designation, sweeping in vaguely affiliated groups
H.R. 4397 — Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025 · Filed by Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) · 37 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 15, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the President to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization within 90 days and to impose sanctions blocking its property and transactions. It also mandates the Secretary of State to submit annual reports identifying all Muslim Brotherhood branches worldwide and determining whether they meet criteria for terrorist designation, with the President required to impose sanctions on any branch meeting those criteria within 30 days of each report. The bill creates a 4-year minimum period before sanctions can be removed and establishes visa ineligibility and mandatory revocation for anyone determined to be a Muslim Brotherhood member.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a mandatory presidential designation of the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization, coupled with annual reporting requirements and sanctions authority. This is a counterterrorism measure, though its scope and definitional breadth raise governance concerns.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'Muslim Brotherhood branch' is extraordinarily broad, encompassing any entity 'directly or indirectly affiliated' with the organization, potentially capturing mainstream charities, civil society groups, and religious organizations with no operational connection to terrorism.
- The bill imposes a mandatory 4-year minimum sanctions period regardless of changed circumstances, removing presidential discretion to adjust designations based on evolving intelligence or diplomatic developments.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill may enhance national security by targeting organizations linked to terrorism financing and support networks, but it creates broad definitional authority that could affect lawful religious organizations, civil society groups, and individuals based on vague affiliation criteria, potentially chilling free association and religious practice without clear due process protections.